Make Hollywood great again
- Laura Malin
- May 13
- 3 min read

After the president of the United States announced a possible 100% tariff on
movies "produced in foreign lands", Hollywood woke up to a doomsday
feeling. Just at the announcement of such measure, with no clear definition
on how it would work, the stock market took a plunge on Netflix, Disney,
Paramount Global, Lionsgate and Warner Bros Discovery stocks (more on
Variety).
The Ambassador
One of Trumps ambassadors, actor Jon Voight, is behind the policy proposal
claiming that tariffs will incentivize domestic film production. The
comprehensive plan was submitted by him and his manager to the president
with the goals of increasing US filmmaking. Voight’s plan involves a
combination of federal tax incentives, tax code changes, co-production
treaties and infrastructure subsidies for theater owners, production and
postproduction companies, according to a press release sent out on Monday
(more on Vulture). While the release only briefly mentioned tariffs, it was the
POTUS focus on his social media.
The POTUS
After describing foreign productions as a “national security threat” and
creating an uproar, the president tried to calm things down by reassuring that
“I’m not looking to hurt the industry, I want to help the industry”. One
practical question needs to be answered: tariffs usually apply to goods
(merchandise or possessions), and a tariff on intellectual property (ideas
and inventions) would be extremely hard to apply and reinforce. In this
clarifying Forbes article, entertainment attorney Schuyler Moore explains
that the proposal is not viable - not only because of the nature of tariffs, but
for multiple reasons.
The Governor
The president had someone to blame for the “very fast death of the movie
industry in America”. He told reporters that the U.S. film industry “has been
decimated by other countries taking them out, and also by incompetence,
like in Los Angeles, the governor [Gavin Newsom] is a grossly incompetent
man, he’s just allowed it to be taken away from.” (CNBC). Gavin Newsom,
who last October has pledged to increase California’s film incentive from
$330 million to $750 million per year, has just proposed a $7.5 billion federal
film incentive as a response. “Now it is time for a real partnership to Make
America Film Again”, he said on social media, shifting the state incentive to a
national level proposal. (Deadline)
The Executives
The truth is that placing tariffs or other trade barriers on foreign-made
products may not make business any easier for Hollywood studios and
streamers. Many American movies and shows are shot on location outside
the United States not only due to tax breaks, but to cheaper labor, diverse
landscape, different union rules, financing and co-production agreements.
The Market
The main question is: could a simple (but exorbitant) tariff reverse the
offshore production trend that has slowly been building up over the years
and has many layers? Just as reference, ProdPro data shows that from 2021
to 2024 the spend on film and TV series in the US dropped from $26 billion
to $19 billion. In the rest of the world, it rose by more than $1.6 billion (THR).
The Trump Tariff Trope
We know that placing tariffs on movies that are shot outside the US could
put Hollywood in an agonizing situation. But if we look at the Trump Tariff
Trope, we know that none of the announced tariffs are in place – yet. As
CNN puts, if the extra taxation on film productions shot abroad passes, it will
be the first. But there are many others in line that were announced before.
The Community
No matter where the tide takes us, we are here to help you navigate the
markets. Reach out if you want to share thoughts and discuss it further.
Please, pass this newsletter along if you think it can help other people. This
is a non-AI, old school way of discussing what matters, when it matters. I
hope you enjoy it!
Best,
Laura